@David I take your point but I fear my management won't see it that way, reinventing the wheel and all that. I shall spend today experimenting with rebuilding parameter lists, which is likely to be a useful technique in this whole exercise. 😉
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 10:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Amode 64 JSON library? My advice is to abandon the horrible Web Enablement services and build a good C JSON parser like json-c. Even better if you can ditch C and use C++ because then you have some very nice options. https://github.com/json-c/json-c https://github.com/nlohmann/json On 13/3/23 18:07, Robin Atwood wrote: > Yes, we are linking in HWTJCSS. It only contains 18 entry points for the 31 > bit routines, AFAICT. > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of > Colin Paice > Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 4:16 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Amode 64 JSON library? > > Are you using > Linkage stub method > <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=parser-syntax-linkage-programming-considerations>(Recommended) > Use the linkable stub routine HWTJCSS from SYS1.CSSLIB to link edit > yourobject code. > <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=parser-syntax-linkage-programming-considerations> > Colin > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 08:55, Robin Atwood <abend...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am investigating the implications of converting a large body of C >> code to >> 64 bit. Compiling with LP64 seems >> straightforward, the problems are at the binder step. I am currently >> getting IEW2469E Reason 3: >> >> "Either the reference or the target is in amode 64 and the amodes do >> not match." >> >> This I was expecting; what I wasn't expecting is an apparent lack of >> 64 bit entry points for the JSON routines. The IBM doc >> >> https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=parser-syntax-linkage-prog >> rammin >> g-considerations >> <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=parser-syntax-linkage-pro >> gramming-considerations> makes no mention of 64 bit calls. I have >> searched, examined header files, looked at samples, but have found no >> clue. >> Am I missing something incredibly obvious or do I have to code stub >> routines myself to convert the parameter lists? >> Has anyone else encountered this? >> >> TIA >> Robin >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send >> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
