Seems there always is,

I usually can go 6 months, sometime I NEED to go that long due to our environment, now, open enrollment, seems these days if your behind a week in maint some part of zosmf or something that relies on that interface fails.

Carmen

On 10/21/2022 10:35 AM, Michael Babcock wrote:
There is a PTF for that.  I can’t remember off the top of my head what it
is though.   I had opened a problem on that very thing and IBM did create
the fix for it.

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 8:18 AM Carmen Vitullo <[email protected]> wrote:

Friday rant

I've been having problems with JES2EDS on 2 other systems in my PLEX,
once I install maint, or IPL JES2EDS gets the 'JES2EDS cannot locate the
zosmf server, what ? it was working fine before, so why can't I IPL a
system and JES2EDS locate the server again?

   I'm so tired of opening up cases, and researching something for days,
sometimes weeks, I usually just let it fail or ignore these messages any
more, yesterday, I re cycled zosmf on my production LPAR, once back up,
JES2EDS connected, well not by itself, but I had to cancel JES2EDS on
that system, a $SEDS did nothing. who builds stuff like this ?

Rant off

Carmen

On 10/19/2022 7:27 AM, Michael Babcock wrote:

Another issue.  PSWI uses GIMUNZIP which invokes DFSMSDSS via API. We
make all of our ZFS data sets VSAM Extended (EA and REQUIRED). Yes,
this isn't necessary I know but we do have a few that are larger than
the 4GB limit.  Anyway, DFSMSDSS does not invoke the DATACLASS, so
there is no way to assign a DATACLASS.    So how in the world do we
make our ZFS data sets VSAM Extended?   What's going to happen when
the root filesystem grows beyond the 4 GB limit in the future?

So far z/OSMF PSWI is not helping.  First, I couldn't select a Target
system but tell it to use a different, existing master cat (like we
could with ServerPac), now this?

On 10/6/2022 10:15 AM, Kurt J. Quackenbush wrote:
As I understand your scenario, you have two z/OS systems, a driving
system (call it A) where the z/OSMF server is running and a target
system (call it B), and you want to install z/OS 2.5 into the
existing master catalog for system B.  Currently you have selected A
as the target system for the deployment.  Unfortunately Software
Management does not have support for installing into an existing
alternate master catalog.  Yes it can install into the driving
system's master catalog, or create and install into a brand new
master catalog, but it does not install into an existing master
catalog that is not the driving system's active master catalog.  As a
circumvention, is B IPL’d?  Is a z/OSMF server running on B?  If so,
then define system B in the z/OSMF Systems task and select it as the
target system for the deployment instead of selecting A.

Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, z/OS SMP/E and z/OSMF Software Management

Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when he applies PTFs.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On
Behalf Of Michael Babcock
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 3:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: z/OSMF PSWI

Okay, more issues.  As I stated, we use a permanent maintenance
volume/system.  With ServerPac, we could define an SSA and have the
SYSRES datasets cataloged in our maintenance systems master cat then
ServerPac would allocate the dataset using an SSA. later it would
generate jobs to remove the SSA.

Unless I’m missing something, this doesn’t seem possible with z/OSMF
because the Modify Catalog section doesn’t let us change the master cat
(even though it says it will).   The only way I see around that is to
rename the SYSRES dataset with the SSA.  Of course we would then need to
create our own rename job to remove the SSA.   Jeez, COME ON PEOPLE!

We were told z/OSMF would provide the same functionality as ServerPac
but I guess not.

On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 3:28 PM Michael Babcock <[email protected]>
wrote:

We are installing z/OS 2.5 via z/OSMF and are using the Modify
Deployment screens.  We can easily change the volumes, HLQs, etc, but
wanted to modify the Primary and/or secondary allocation and don’t
see a way to do that.

We have a case opened with IBM and have been told there is no way to do
that and no plans for it in the future.   What?    We could do that
with
the ServerPac, why not with z/OSMF?   I was under the impression that
z/OSMF would provide most functions that ServerPac provided.

So, is that capability not going to be provided?


--
Michael Babcock
OneMain Financial
z/OS Systems Programmer, Lead

--
Michael Babcock
OneMain Financial
z/OS Systems Programmer, Lead

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
Carmen

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
Carmen

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to