<snip> The default console definition used by z/OSMF is the default value of the OPERPARM segment in SAF. For instance, ROUTCODE would default to NONE. z/OSMF has a sample job.... </snip>
The sample, which can be found in 'sys1.samplib(IZUGCSEC)', actually has sample statements that are commented out. So even if you ran the sample as-is (or with changing only things such as userid and the console name but leaving the sample statements commented out) there would be no change to the OPERPARM definition. Therefore, it seems, the OP's shop must have uncommented-out the statements and provided a valid console name (and thus "asked for" the routing code definition that Health Checker "complained about"), perhaps not realizing the ramifications of leaving the value as "ROUTCODE(all)". We will look into providing better guidance on what to do here, to make it clearer how to avoid a definition that is deemed not to be a good practice. That might well start by changing the statement that is commented out not to have "ALL" but instead have something that you must change in order for it to be valid, accompanied by some guidance that might show what some of the options are and also what you should not use. At that point, if all you did was uncomment it, you would not get "ALL", you would not even get something valid. That would get your attention when the system complained when you tried to use it! Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
