Without meaning to bump into what might be off topic, SYSCALL is
actually a CLIST instruction - not a REXX one (unless it's a case of
"nous avons changé tout ça")
E.g.
HELP_SELECT: +
SELECT (&ZCMD)
WHEN (UP) DO
SET HPAN = &HPAN - 1
*SYSCALL* MAXV HPAN HELPTOP
ENDO
WHEN (DOWN) DO
SET HPAN = &HPAN + 1
*SYSCALL* MINV HPAN HELPBOT
ENDO
OTHERWISE
ENDO HELP_SELECT
ISPEXEC DISPLAY PANEL(HELPANL&HPAN)
ENDO
<...>
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/* SUB-PROCEDURE MINV */
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/
MINV: +
PROC 0 +
HPAN HELPBOT
CONTROL END(ENDO)
SYSREF +
HPAN HELPBOT
IF &STR(&HPAN) > &STR(&HELPBOT) THEN +
SET HPAN = &HELPBOT
ELSE
RETURN
ENDO MINV
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/* SUB-PROCEDURE MAXV */
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/
MAXV: +
PROC 0 +
HPAN HELPTOP
CONTROL END(ENDO)
SYSREF +
HPAN HELPTOP
IF &STR(&HPAN) < &STR(&HELPTOP) THEN +
SET HPAN = &HELPTOP
ELSE
RETURN
ENDO MAXV
<etc.>
On 07/07/2022 19:01, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> (This thread should move to comp.lang.advocacy.)
>
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 16:40:08 +0000, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>
>> OK, I'll bite: What is BSF please? I do know of PCRE (though I really do
>> not like the Perl RE syntax, I prefer Posix/gawk RE syntax) but BSF is a new
>> acronym to me.
>>
> I try to keep my skill set portable. I avoid Bash-isms, {g|n}awk, ... Now
> that you say PCRE
> is different, my interest in it is diminished.
>
> It seems to me that many users of {g|n}awk learned a primitive awk lacking
> many features
> such as tolowerr(), touppor(), the "in" operator, ... now assimilated in
> POSIX awk.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
