Jake, I don't know your specific configuration. If by DR you mean a BC site with two synchronous disks array (and tape), most of the customer I know periodically swap primary and secondary site. If DR is an offline (asynchronous) site maybe tests could have been performed less often then the number of check items increase. For example, product password (CPU ID related) can be a headache. Nice to have a "minimal IPL system" with all product installed to IVP check before the big bang.
Max <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Mail priva di virus. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> Il giorno lun 13 giu 2022 alle ore 21:24 Jake Anderson < [email protected]> ha scritto: > Hello > > Good morning to all > > Due to a business reason we are swapping our mainframer sites where the > current DR machine will be converted to production and Production machine > will be a DR site. I understand these exercise are mostly done by the IBM > CE from support element. Is there anything to be watched out from z/OS > perspective and what are the other gotchas ? > > Appreciate if you could share your thoughts on this and would like to hear > if someone has done his similar in your Shop > > Jake > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
