Correct! Bingo! THAT explains everything.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Smith Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 10:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: CIBXUTOK fetch protected Well, S0C4-11 does not mean the storage is fetch-protected. It means the virtual address doesn't exist. Are you sure you're looking at a CIB? STCs have one for the START command, but I think batch jobs only get one when a command (MODIFY or STOP) is sent to them later on. sas On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 1:31 PM Ituriel do Neto < [email protected]> wrote: > Mike, > > I don't think so, but to remove all doubts i have associated the PROCNAME > in class STARTED with my userid. > > Now both STC and batch job run with the same userid, but when batch, > the CIBXTOKN continues to be fetch protected giving me and abend S0C4-11 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
