On 23/4/22 00:19, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Apr 22, 2022, at 3:42 AM, David Crayford <[email protected]> wrote:
If you already deliver container images that support your product that
currently run outside z/OS, or if that’s what you plan to do, it’d be a great
idea to add s390x compatibility to your container images so your customers have
greater deployment flexibility. That’s usually quite easy to do.
Good advice. I would also add that if you are a vendor planning to deliver zCX
container images then make sure you add other compatibilities just in case your
customers don't run zCX. It could be a POC obstacle.
Building the s390x containers is straight forward. It’s the POC challenge.
It’s like showing up with SAE tools to work on a car that is metric. Not going
to be very useful.
Couldn't agree more. There is a lot of excitement about zCX but you
can't hang your hat on it. If you do, you may not have a viable product.
Matt Hogstrom
[email protected]
+1-919-656-0564
PGP Key: 0x90ECB270
Facebook <https://facebook.com/matt.hogstrom> LinkedIn
<https://linkedin/in/mhogstrom> Twitter <https://twitter.com/hogstrom>
“It may be cognitive, but, it ain’t intuitive."
— Hogstrom
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
