Or " I bought a z114, now what? " Share presentation?

On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 9:55 AM Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If he gets it up, might IBM ask him to write up the experience for a redbook?
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of 
> Timothy Sipples [[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 1:19 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: HS student with question about small mainframe DASD
>
> Enzo,
>
> Here’s a “quick highlights” tour of the IBM z114 with hobbyist intentions. 
> This information is thoroughly unofficial. Let’s first run through the 
> highest operating system releases that the IBM z114 supports:
>
> z/OS 2.2 (current is 2.5)
> z/VM 6.4 (current is 7.2)
> IBM z/VSE 6.2 (current from IBM)
> [Ask 21st Century Software about VSEn 6.3]
> z/TPF: officially sometime prior to 1.1.0.14 (current is 2022)
> Linux: up to SLES 12.x, up to RHEL 7.x
> Ubuntu no (Canonical started with z12), but current Debian 11 (“bullseye”) 
> should still be OK
>
> Summary: With a couple exceptions (such as Debian Linux and z/VSE) current 
> operating system releases are no longer compatible with the IBM z114. I don’t 
> know if this fact is a “veto” or not, but it’s something to be aware of.
>
> z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE, z/TPF, and VSEn are licensed operating systems. You’ll 
> need to contact IBM (or 21st Century Software) and somehow obtain a license 
> if you’d like to run any of those. Those releases (except for z/VSE 6.2 and 
> VSEn 6.3) are also Withdrawn from Marketing, so they’d require a very special 
> order if it’s even possible.
>
> z/OS and z/TPF require ECKD (FICON-attached) storage, and z/TPF’s storage 
> requirements are slightly more involved than that simple statement. All the 
> other operating systems support “SCSI” (FC-attached) storage. If your z114 
> includes ESCON ports then that’s another possible option, although there 
> wasn’t a lot of physically small ESCON-attached storage. And ESCON storage is 
> very old now, although it’d probably be inexpensive if you find it. The IBM 
> z114 was the very last IBM Z server that (optionally) supported ESCON without 
> a converter box. FICON-attached (and ESCON-attached) storage is directly 
> attachable: no SAN switch required. You’re quite correct that the smallest 
> FICON-attached storage that IBM ever made was the IBM DS6000 family (a.k.a. 
> DS6800). If you can find one in working condition and suitably configured 
> it’ll support up to 2 Gb/s FICON (“FICON 2”). As long as your IBM z114 has 
> any sort of working FICON ports that should be fine since even the FICON 
> Express8S adapters can negotiate down to 2 Gb/s. A minority of IBM z114 
> machines have only ESCON ports (or occasionally no storage ports at all if 
> they were Coupling Facility machines), or the FICON ports aren’t working for 
> some reason. That’d be bad, although if it has both ESCON and FICON that 
> could be useful. (An ESCON-attached tape drive, for example.) Hypothetically 
> you could start the z/OS Customized Offerings Driver (COD) Version 3.1 
> without FICON-attached storage available (from the HMC DVD typically), but 
> that probably wouldn’t be too exciting except as a basic machine test.
>
> Speaking of which, does this z114 include a working HMC?
>
> z/OS, z/VSE, z/TPF, and VSEn also require at least one general purpose 
> processor (CP) on the machine, subcapacity or otherwise. In other words the 
> machine needs to be an A01 capacity model or higher for those operating 
> systems. It was possible to configure a z114 without CPs. The z114 included a 
> minimum of 8GB of usable memory, so memory shouldn’t be a problem for 
> hobbyist purposes. Other engine types (IFLs, zIIPs, ICFs) are less 
> interesting but can be nice to have, particularly the IFLs I’d say. If the 
> seller says “Oh, it’s a M05” or “It’s a M10” (or 2818-M05/2818-M10), that 
> probably refers to the hardware model. There is a M05 capacity model, i.e. 
> z114 machines configured with 5 CPs set to the “M” subcapacity level. This 
> M05/M05 can be confusing if you’re trying to figure out what you’re getting 
> before you get it, so just try to clarify that point. The 2818-M05 (hardware 
> model) is a single drawer machine, and the 2818-M10 is a dual drawer machine. 
> For power draw/hobbyist purposes the single drawer configuration is likely 
> preferable, although I suppose if you’re very careful and know what you’re 
> doing you might be able to “field convert” a M10 to a M05. I also suppose 
> that the M10 adds some redundancy, so if something breaks or is broken you’re 
> slightly more likely to be able to soldier on.
>
> For FC-attached storage, officially (and probably technically also) you’ll 
> need a suitable SAN switch in the loop. I see a used IBM 2498-B24 (SAN24B-4) 
> SAN switch on eBay for $49 or best offer, and that’d probably get the job 
> done very nicely since it supports all the relevant FC line speeds you could 
> encounter. Although you have to hope for a high enough firmware level perhaps 
> since the z114 was introduced after that SAN switch.
>
> If you embark on this project, good luck! Please keep us posted.
>
> — — — — —
> Timothy Sipples
> Senior Architect
> Digital Assets, Industry Solutions, and Cyber Security
> IBM zSystems and LinuxONE
> [email protected]
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to