The batched response with a summary was the norm in the UUCP days, but less common on the Internet.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 10:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Rexx routine to dump all variables when debugging? On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 02:44:51 +0000, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote: >That sounds interesting, but if it is tied to ISPF I would much prefer >something that works in vanilla batch. My immediate need is batch Rexx >executed from plain unadorned IKFEFT01, so TSO Rexx facilities are available >but not ISPF. > There are some facilities available in Rexx under TSO but not IRXJCL or UNIX. However, I doubt those are relevant to your need. >It used to be that our actual email addresses showed in the listserv headers, >but I guess they are trying to protect our identities. > Diametrically opposed to the classic USENET netiquette, which was to reply directly to the OP who was expected to summarize replies. Holy moly! What a concept! No message floods! The sender's true address appears in the LISTSERV web interface. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
