In <[email protected]>, on 03/28/2013
at 05:58 PM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> said:
>I know I can call from Rexx using "standard" MVS linkage using
>ADDRESS LINKMVS or LINKPGM. (We just went over the differences
>here; let's not digress into that!) But if I am RTFM correctly,
>LINKMVS/PGM requires a separate load module or alias (or IDENTIFY
>and I don't think I want to go there for this).
It's not my dog.
>I don't *think* I can make a standard MVS linkage function part of
>a Rexx function package, is that right? LINKMVS/PGM and Rexx
>functions live in different worlds, right? LINKMVS/PGM always
>searches for MVS entry points, and only Rexx functions use
>function packages, is that right?
Correct.
>Or does anyone know something I am missing?
Other than the fact that you'll wind up with duplicate copies of the
function and will have the hassle of keeping the C++ and REXX copies
in synch with each other.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
