On 7/01/2022 11:37 am, David Crayford wrote:
Isn't JCL already a really good tool for what it does?
Maybe, but it's a terribly designed language. I worked on AS/400 boxes
in the 90s and the Control Language (CL) was a legit Turing complete
program language. Why couldn't JCL have been the same?
I think it is a mistake to think of JCL as a program language. It is a
language that defines what to run and the environment to run it in. So
it is better compared to XML, JSON etc or even a makefile than e.g.
shell scripts.
The syntax is poor, admittedly, I think as a result of having evolved
over time rather than developing a strict definition at the start. It
would probably be possible to write a new interpreter and replace JCL
with XML or JSON without losing any functionality - if it is the syntax
that bothers you.
--
Andrew Rowley
Black Hill Software
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
