You are welcome to submit an RCF. However, the interruption is not on accessing storage. It is on the address wrapping.
I'm not involved in the architecture but I strongly doubt that the book is wrong. Eric Rossman, CISSP® ICSF Cryptographic Security Development z/OS Enabling Technologies [email protected] "Paul Gilmartin" <[email protected]>: > I'll disagree with that. An interrupt condition is *never* recognized > "during generation of [an] address." An addressing exception or a > protection exception may be recognized subsequently when that > address is used to access storage. And that is unrelated to whether > a carry out of the high-order bit position occurred. > > Address generation and storage access are two different topics. They > should be discussed separately. > > Should I submit an RCF? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
