Ed Jaffe wrote:
>I meant to say there was _no defense_ that could be used by IBM against
>the rationale presented in the requirement.
Ok, then what you said indeed wasn't what you intended to say, as I suspected!
Just checkin', thanks.
("indefensible argument" means "the argument is easily attacked and cannot be
defended", not "cannot be defended *against*")
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
