Hobart Spitz wrote, in part: >This is a great comment. I hadn't given that much thought to the question.
>Not to split hairs, but I didn't say MIPS, I said hardware. >If I had to guess, MIPS usage might actually increase slightly, because the >Pipes dispatcher has to switch between stages twice for every record that >is passed. Sure, just sayin' you'd want to be very clear about what you do mean. I'm not quite sure what you mean by "more MIPS but less hardware", though? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
