I very clearly don't work for BMC, either. :-) And it's not just professional courtesy that suggests they're almost certainly correct:
1) It's probably a more-or-less simple copy from the source to the destination - and would've been reported as a bug long ago. 2) As I indicated, the data makes sense. For example, what would the End User Workstation ID be for a batch job? Cheers, Martin Martin Packer WW z/OS Performance, Capacity and Architecture, IBM Technology Sales +44-7802-245-584 email: [email protected] Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://mainframeperformancetopics.com Mainframe, Performance, Topics Podcast Series (With Marna Walle): https://anchor.fm/marna-walle Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA From: "Charles Mills" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 03/09/2021 16:44 Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: SMF field data Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <[email protected]> Yes, the fields are not "intuitive." It is hard to predict -- or at least it was for me -- what fields would be populated under what circumstances. I am going to venture a wild guess that the BMC report is correct. (I don't work for BMC, and I am not familiar with the specific product.) Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin Packer Sent: Friday, September 3, 2021 5:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SMF field data I think it's perfectly valid to have a blank QWHCEUWN - End User Workstation Name. What Db2 connection type (QWHCATYP) and reason for invoking accounting (QWACRINV) values do you have? Cheers, Martin Martin Packer WW z/OS Performance, Capacity and Architecture, IBM Technology Sales +44-7802-245-584 email: [email protected] Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://mainframeperformancetopics.com Mainframe, Performance, Topics Podcast Series (With Marna Walle): https://anchor.fm/marna-walle Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA From: "Bill Giannelli" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 02/09/2021 19:53 Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: SMF field data Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List" <[email protected]> the product we have is the BMC reporting tool. I am trying to determine if it is reporting correctly and what the SMF source actually contains ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
