Ooops. PolitiFact - Posts correct about Trump administration’s role in releasing key Taliban leader | | | | | |
| | | | | PolitiFact - Posts correct about Trump administration’s role in releasing key Taliban leader As the Taliban celebrated its rapid takeover of Afghanistan, blame for the fall of the U.S.-backed Afghan government and/ | | | | Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Sunday, August 22, 2021, 10:07 PM, Joe Monk <[email protected]> wrote: Actually it was Obama who released all the Taliban, in the trade for the traitor Bergdahl. Get your facts straight. https://nypost.com/2021/08/16/taliban-leader-was-freed-from-guantanamo-in-2014-swap-by-obama/ Joe On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 8:30 PM Bill Johnson < [email protected]> wrote: > Trump started the process of leaving Afghanistan. Even released 5000 > Taliban including their current leader. We aren't leaving Americans behind. > Biden will be president for another 3 1/2 years, unless he falls ill and > Kamala takes over. And knowing that probably really gets you going pleases > me. > > On Sunday, August 22, 2021, 08:01:21 PM EDT, Savor, Thomas < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Your guy is in-defensible...great job in Afghanistan...superb !!! > Not only did we leave a bunch of US citizens there, but left NATO troops > there...so Ooooh another Dumbass !!! > Biden makes Carter look good...I thought Obozo was bad...Biden is probably > going to be removed soon...or at least starting the process. > > Thanks, > > Tom > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf > Of Bill Johnson > Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2021 7:45 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Programs that work right the first time. > > Ooooh, another trumper. > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > On Sunday, August 22, 2021, 7:42 PM, Wayne Bickerdike <[email protected]> > wrote: > > *I knew I'd trigger the trumpers here.* > > Trolls have that effect. > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 9:38 AM Bill Johnson < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > I knew I'd trigger the trumpers here. > > > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > > > On Sunday, August 22, 2021, 7:27 PM, Savor, Thomas < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > "In April 2020, a voter fraud study covering 20 years by the > > Massachusetts Institute of Technology found the level of mail-in > > ballot fraud "exceedingly rare" since it occurs only in "0.00006 > > percent" of instances nationally, and, in one state, "0.000004 percent > > - about five times less likely than getting hit by lightning." > > > > That's by far the stupidest comment I've heard in long > > time.....MIT...Mass..area nothing but Democrats (of course, the > > election was clean). We already know that Arizona was fraud, Georgia > > was fraud...Georgia is trying to figure out how to audit Fulton County > > where terrible voting irregularities occurred...but the fraud machine > > is heavy...Next you are going to tell me that the Georgia voting law > > is wrong...if you think so STOP WATCHING CNN. But I know nothing will > happen. > > > > We will not be secure with our elections until we go back to paper > > ballots...i don't trust electronic voting at all...the Rats didn't > > like under Bush, the GOP doesn't like it now. > > > > You say, " how can they cheat electronically"...guys think about it. > > Your PC recognizes when you plug something into USB...right. > > Volkswagen got into a lot of trouble when diesel car was plugged into > > emissions test...system recognized it, and changed the settings to > > pass emissions...then when unplugged, car computer reset system back to > normal. > > So easily, a voting machine can recognize being audited, do things > > correctly, then when unplugged, go back to "coded" settings....voting > > machines by Law, once certified, are supposed to be dis-connected from > > the Internet, but we know that didn't happen in Arizona. > > > > There were 153 million registered voters in 2016, when 60% > > voted...which is a pretty high amount. > > In 2020, 168 million registered voters, 80+ for Biden 74+ for Trump, > > for 92% voted...impossible. > > > > Biden tried to have a rally here in Georgia during the > > election...couldnt get 100 people to show up...Trump had a rally here > > in Georgia filled up Mercedes Benz stadium, with about 50-60 thousand > outside. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tom > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On > > Behalf Of Bill Johnson > > Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2021 6:37 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: Programs that work right the first time. > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the company. Do not > > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and > > know the content is safe. > > > > > > > > The number of lines of code is absolutely a good way to determine > > complexity. To say otherwise is silly. Is it a 100% correlation, of > > course not. Reminds me of people who say that elections are fraudulent > > and point to the handful of voter fraud incidents when the reality is, > > voter fraud is in effect zero. > > In April 2020, a voter fraud study covering 20 years by the > > Massachusetts Institute of Technology found the level of mail-in > > ballot fraud "exceedingly rare" since it occurs only in "0.00006 > > percent" of instances nationally, and, in one state, "0.000004 percent > > - about five times less likely than getting hit by lightning. > > > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone > > > > > > On Sunday, August 22, 2021, 6:25 PM, Jeremy Nicoll < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 22 Aug 2021, at 19:49, Bill Johnson wrote: > > > You claim to know of a 1 line APL super complex program but when > > > asked to prove it can't. > > > > What I actually said was: > > > > "A good case in point is that in APL a useful program can be written > >in one line." > > > > I /did not/ say that I knew of a (specific) 1 line super complex > > program, just indicating that useful one-liners exist in APL. > > > > I was merely suggesting that the number of lines in a program was not > > a good way of estimating complexity. > > > > The two examples I pointed you at on the APL wikipedia page are both > > (I > > think) good examples of how a single line of code can (a) do a lot, > > and (b) be hard to understand at a glance. Even if the individual APL > > operators (all those greek characters) were represented by operator > > names, or even function names (though they are not functions) I do not > > think anyone could guess what those lines do. > > > > There's a short line of code (only 17 characters!) that determines > > "all the prime numbers up to R". Search (for the text in quotes) on > > the quite long webpage at > > > > > > https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcomp > > uterhistory.org%2Fblog%2Fthe-apl-programming-language-source-code%2F&a > > mp;data=04%7C01%7Cthomas.savor%40fisglobal.com%7C49fb820627c844a0fe840 > > 8d965c6e4f7%7Ce3ff91d834c84b15a0b418910a6ac575%7C0%7C0%7C6376527271912 > > 49652%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB > > TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=4%2F8j4Zay2oUavcE%2BNp9a5I > > A2t6NEYnc2ynFRepS9P6Y%3D&reserved=0 > > > > to see it, with an explanation there of how that program works. > > > > It's a whole lot less easy to understand than the equivalent written > > in, say COBOL. > > > > -- > > Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The > > information contained in this message is proprietary and/or > > confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) > > delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or > > use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender > > immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed > > to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other than > the intended recipient. Thank you. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > -- > Wayne V. Bickerdike > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or > confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the > message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message > in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please > be aware that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving > and review by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
