Arthur, the other one was also me... This is why I updated to computerworld. But the register also had one. Anyway, what's wrong with IBM-MAIN? Many threads starts with a technical issue and dive into machine models in the sixties or the exact noise of the CRAM disk...
ITschak ITschak Mugzach *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring for z/OS, x/Linux & IBM I **| z/VM coming soon * On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 7:45 AM Arthur <ibmmain.10.ats...@xoxy.net> wrote: > On 25 Jun 2021 10:09:52 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main > (Message-ID:< > caodpegtnnkocx9uyh4dqqtezsh7535+7ac3bcwhguubfpq7...@mail.gmail.com>) > 00000305158ad67d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu (Itschak > Mugzach) wrote: > > >The register ( I think) has someone tells his experience > under the name of > >'shark tank'. > > No, that was Computerworld. As mentioned by someone else, > it's no longer being updated. > > The Register has the weekly equivalent "On Call" which is > being updated: > https://www.theregister.com/Tag/on-call > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
