On 6/15/2021 7:21 AM, Richards, Robert B. (CTR) wrote:
Temporary condition: Is it okay to fire up a different JES2 spool and
checkpoints on the sandbox system, removing the MAS definitions,etc. while
still being part of the sysplex *and* those systems still believing that the
sandbox JES2 is still part of their MAS? That will allow me to continue to work
on the z/OS 2.4 implementation without waiting for our change management
process to propagate the fixes across the other environments.
Point to different SPOOL volumes and change the XCF group name. Then you
should be good...
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the
information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise
received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution,
review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information
contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email
message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this
email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be
free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into
which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient
to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the
sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
