On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 05:54:17 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote:

>Presumably he's saying that nobody in his right mind would simply copy the 
>data on the tape to a byte stream, and that the most obvious way to archive 
>the tape is to convert it to AWSTAPE format. Once it's in AWSTAPE format, then 
>it's simple to read it under Hercules, assuming that the labels and records 
>follow OS/360 conventions.
>
Amen.  Joe Monk's and Radoslaw's comments appear well-informed.
And with 9-track I believe there's no need to deal with the abomination
of even parity.  ( knew an old CDC OS that relied on the difference to
discern filetypes, even replicating the behavior in DASD files.)

It's a pity there's no facility to process AWSTAPE directly with no need
for a step to convert to virtual or real 3480.  Subsystem? ISV?  Or to
generate AWSTAPE on Linux, MacOS, or Windows.

Does a dump of the first block say "VOL1"?

If the OP believes the tapes contain useful data he probably knows
which utility can process the restored images.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to