I don't recall the details, but CTC didn't want to fix their compatibility issues. Tritus quickly resolved everything that I reported to them, and TSPF is my usual editor.
Now if I just had an editor that was fully compatible with XEDIT. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 6:39 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SPF/SE.... out of business? On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:39:27 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >Keep in mind that the last CTC editor to support REXX was SPF/PC. > With what compatibility? 3-level library definition? Shared variable pools? LM services such as LMINIT, LMOPEN, LMCOPY, LMPUT, LMMSTTATS, ...? CMS ISPF achieves much of that with outboard files. I could imagine using Extended Attributes. I remember most of my XEDIT macros didn't work with Workstation Group's Uni-Xedit. >________________________________________ >From: Michael Knigge >Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 12:03 PM > >I guess some folks of you know and use the SPF-like Editor SPF/SE (or >�SPF/365�) from Command Technology� Does anyone of you know what�s up with >this company? Web-Site is down and I get no replies of my mails�. Does Tim >Tetiva just closed this business without informing his customers? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
