On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 14:45:37 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>Waste of bits. IND$File is the b@stard child of an orphan. It's AMODE/RMODE
>24, if that gives you any clue as to its currency.
>
>IMHO
>
Yes, but ... The use of IND$FILE remains so prevalent (partly because
of absurd site security rules), and the use of zFS has become so prevalent,
that the union should be sanctified.
I can hardly imagine that transferring a Classic data set is performed
except by ALLOCATing it, and a general technique for allocation is
hinted at in:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r4.bpxa500/tso.htm
The match should be made.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Gilmartin
>Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 11:39 AM
>On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 11:36:31 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>>AFAIR no.
>RFE?
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Paul Gilmartin
>>Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 11:25 AM
>>
>>I'm involved in a thread on ISPF-L:
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/a/nd.edu/g/ispf-l-list/c/aoszBZ0Z5WI/m/UvWM_WzCBQAJ
>>
>>I wonder if the OP there would do better to use zFS with better tools
>>available such as chtag, extattr, and tr. But is IND$FILE zFS-savvy?
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
