Seymour mentioned it was the same TCB But different RB or more specifically IRB
> On Oct 11, 2020, at 2:19 PM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 09:08:54 -0400 Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: > > :>>if there is any restriction on deleting an ALET entry > :>>(ALESERV DELETE) from a STIMERM exit > > :>It is not a "restriction", it is a "does not make sense" situation. It > :>goes well beyond "delete". > > :>IRBs (STIMERM exits being one such) do not get control with the access > :>list that their "mainline" (the STIMERM issuing code) had. > :>You cannot use an ALET not on your access list. You cannot delete an ALET > :>not on your access list. > > :>If you had tried to reference storage using that ALET while within the > :>STIMERM exit you would have gotten a program interrupt. > > Peter, > > I have looked in various manuals and did not find a clear definition of when a > new "workunit" is created. My assumption from this thread was that an IRB > created one, but I wonder if there are other occasions. It would not have been > obvious to me that an IRB would not inherit the workunit of the TCB. > > -- > Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> > http://www.dissensoftware.com > > Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel > > > Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, > you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. > > I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, > especially those from irresponsible companies. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
