So, does this mean that a cloud environment is more or less likely to be attacked than the same on premise environment?
Such an attack could cause a major disruption in operations and thinking. Sent from my iPhone — small keyboarf, fat fungrs, stupd spell manglr. Expct mistaks > On Sep 7, 2020, at 11:20 AM, Joe Monk <joemon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Let me tell you why it is not such a hypothetical problem... > > As we all know, Microsoft now allows under Windows for Linux, Windows > access to Linux datastores. So, imagine I have a mainframe data store > mounted as a Linux FS on a Windows box running Windows for Linux. Now, the > windows box gets ransom'd ... what happens to the Linux FS mounted on the > Windows box? > > In case you dont know about it: > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/install-win10 > > Joe > >> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 8:47 AM kekronbekron < >> 000002dee3fcae33-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: >> >> "I see no relationship to the ransomware problem,..." >> >> The whole topic is a hypothetical discussion.. don't know what to say for >> the relation not being understandable. >> Just a thought for damage control.. >> >> Obviously, obvious security measures have still let this hypothetical >> problem through (either bypassed or less-than-optimal security measures)... >> so fiddling with user accesses at this point is irrelevant. >> >> Whole world knows how to prevent.. but actually doing it is a whole >> another matter of tools, processes, capabilities, and such. >> >> - KB >> >> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >> On Monday, September 7, 2020 7:08 PM, R.S. <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl> >> wrote: >> >>> W dniu 07.09.2020 o 14:57, kekronbekron pisze: >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
