On Sat, 5 Sep 2020, at 21:09, Bob Bridges wrote:
> <g> I've never done that, but I have done something like it:
>
> str=word('true false',(0-fx)+2)
Why (0-fx)+2 when 2-fx is simpler?
> (If I have to explain it, it just proves I should never write it that
> way in the first place. This is better:
>
> if fx then str='true'; else str=true
Not really. That might as well have been
str = "true"
but somewhat pointless. (Sorry.)
--
Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
