z/VM and z/VSE allow 3215s as their consoles. z/OS does not. z/OS requires a 3270 full screen console.
Regards. Lloyd -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 11:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Multi-channel OSA-ICC routing and TCP port behavior I don't have an answer to that. I know what works and what does not. I never dug into what was different due to the settings. Most likely, it was something not in the specifications that z/OS happened to use, or had added for some reason, to the 3274 long ago. Tony Thigpen Seymour J Metz wrote on 7/21/20 9:32 AM: > Doesn't z/OS work with a real 3270 as a console? If so, then it's the ICC > that's doing something nonstandard with the 3270 setting. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > ________________________________________ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on > behalf of Tony Thigpen [t...@vse2pdf.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 9:18 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Multi-channel OSA-ICC routing and TCP port behavior > > Brian, > > In regards to the '3270' or 'console' setting, that is very specific > to z/OS. On z/VSE and z/VM the consoles are set to '3270' in the ICC > configuration. Setting the value to 'console' for them will lead to > problems. Yet, on z/OS, you must set the field to 'console' handle to > some quirk that z/OS has as it relates to consoles. > > So, back to your question: "Why?", because z/OS again used something > non-standard in the operating system. > > (As someone that works across all three of the operating systems, I > see this often. z/OS plays by it's own house rules, not the rules > printed inside the box top.) > > Tony Thigpen > > Brian Westerman wrote on 7/21/20 4:44 AM: >> I completely disagree. Why would IBM have two settings in the configuration >> screen for them, one as a 3270 and the other as a console, if they only >> wanted you to be able to use consoles? >> >> Brian >> >> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:25:54 +0000, Parwez Hamid <parwez_ha...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Agreed. The full name is OSA-Express Integrated Console Controller and was >>> primarly meant to provide Console Support to IPL OSes. Overtime, its use >>> has evolved but the basic concept remains. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Parwez Hamid >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on >>> behalf of R.S. <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl> >>> Sent: 20 July 2020 12:17 >>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> >>> Subject: Re: Multi-channel OSA-ICC routing and TCP port behavior >>> >>> Excuse me, but IMHO OSA-ICC is just way to get rid off old equipment >>> like 3174L. It is NOT replacement, it is only for local (called >>> non-SNA) terminals, printers and ...CONSOLES. Consoles are the most >>> important. Of course 3172, 3274, and other controllers were not the goal. >>> >>> IBM went looong way from 3174s to to ICC. There were 2074 (quite >>> expensive), VTAM consoles (not very usable for IPL), older SYSCON >>> (Operating System Messages on HMC) and the latest 3270-like SYSG aka >>> PCOMM-like icon in HMC. SYSG is AFAIK z/VM nomenclature. >>> >>> >>> BTW, Note, nomenclaure for "HMC-like" consoles: >>> 1. Operating System Messages >>> z/VM: SYSC >>> z/OS: SYSCON >>> >>> 2. HMC Integrated 3270 console (is it proper name?) >>> z/VM: SYSG >>> z/OS: HMCS >>> >>> I don't know about other OSes. >>> >>> -- >>> Radoslaw Skorupka >>> Lodz, Poland >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> W dniu 19.07.2020 o 15:17, Tony Thigpen pisze: >>>> Christian, >>>> I was dismayed too when I first discovered this limitation. The >>>> OSA-C was originally intended to eliminate the local 3174 >>>> requirement. It was not really designed to replace the 3172-003, >>>> which is what many are using it for today. >>>> >>>> And, you also need to look back at the OSA-C's roots which was the >>>> 3274 emulation in the P370, P390 and the MP3000. >>>> >>>> Tony Thigpen >>>> >>>> Christian Svensson wrote on 7/19/20 8:40 AM: >>>>> Thanks for the input folks. >>>>> >>>>> Brian: I have it working just fine, the setup was easy as you said >>>>> - the reason I started this thread was because I couldn't >>>>> understand why the limitations on the TCP port number and the >>>>> philosophy behind the routing. >>>>> >>>>> It seems pretty weird to me that IBM implemented ICC this way, but >>>>> hey - I'm just a stranger on the internet :-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020, 06:52 Brian Westerman >>>>> <brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You can set up some of the ports to be local VTAM terminals, then >>>>>> you can use VISTA (or any 3270 emulator) to connect into the ICC >>>>>> port 3270, and use the LUNAME of the 3270 you defined as a local >>>>>> 3270 terminal. Since you can have over 100 terminals per port, >>>>>> making them all os consoles is a waste, so having a bunch of them >>>>>> as local 3270's that you can give to your carious LPARs (and use >>>>>> EE to connect to the LPARs they are not connected to), is a great >>>>>> way to use them. >>>>>> >>>>>> I like to make the first 16 to 32 devices OS consoles and the >>>>>> rest of them local 3270s. >>>>>> >>>>>> So you are using TCP to get to them inside the ICC, but they are >>>>>> technically local 3270 terminals. I think you can make some of >>>>>> them printers if you want, but that seems like a waste. >>> >>> >>> ==================================================================== >>> == >>> >>> Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości: >>> >>> - powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!), >>> - usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub >>> zapisałeś na dysku). >>> Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może >>> wykorzystać tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia >>> (kopiuje, rozprowadza) tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania, >>> narusza prawo i może podlegać karze. >>> >>> mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 >>> Warszawa,http://secure-web.cisco.com/1MW054EG3HH7zd6_KYgB3xHiByIRUCFrvFJ2qRs4lx6D5q0lhK5v1uSeOBCWS5lSDHI5BmwmkQxhE9yoWBxRFU2AI1ifWz7fzZByptEaMZHD00xwCpmbl6XhDWJZP508IDcMIMukeMGVzZcErMFeuckwFjha9ch7_h8Stc4Ayuwh4RUSAh5THcPOjv3x3_HEnhWAJNKhFRKjK-gsHDBCogtyfdaXWeavEvwEGjKl4j4rfki_1nzjQibqtcP19C3AKMdMKlw1sIhYzDQHZxD3_nW_YnVUVnxS55UmRmfLHcGt58YMRFYKRYL6t5AucuIMOnleJuoYV-lTlnmI7iGviSmqGITb2fuZx5rnu_WEGBmgxqmWBwgPt8ZblcnFGJ6Pcqe6rJlLNkKvVATSW2ZfHm0HpACAjtLwAUsIueqJg2OFGztYmi5ZpBNAyn0G_xPEf/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mBank.pl, >>> e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział >>> Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS 0000025237, NIP: >>> 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości) według stanu na >>> 01.01.2020 r. wynosi 169.401.468 złotych. >>> >>> If you are not the addressee of this message: >>> >>> - let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!), >>> - delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you have >>> printed out or saved). >>> This message may contain legally protected information, which may be used >>> exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who >>> disseminates (copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar >>> action, violates the law and may be penalised. >>> >>> mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 >>> Warszawa,http://secure-web.cisco.com/1MW054EG3HH7zd6_KYgB3xHiByIRUCFrvFJ2qRs4lx6D5q0lhK5v1uSeOBCWS5lSDHI5BmwmkQxhE9yoWBxRFU2AI1ifWz7fzZByptEaMZHD00xwCpmbl6XhDWJZP508IDcMIMukeMGVzZcErMFeuckwFjha9ch7_h8Stc4Ayuwh4RUSAh5THcPOjv3x3_HEnhWAJNKhFRKjK-gsHDBCogtyfdaXWeavEvwEGjKl4j4rfki_1nzjQibqtcP19C3AKMdMKlw1sIhYzDQHZxD3_nW_YnVUVnxS55UmRmfLHcGt58YMRFYKRYL6t5AucuIMOnleJuoYV-lTlnmI7iGviSmqGITb2fuZx5rnu_WEGBmgxqmWBwgPt8ZblcnFGJ6Pcqe6rJlLNkKvVATSW2ZfHm0HpACAjtLwAUsIueqJg2OFGztYmi5ZpBNAyn0G_xPEf/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mBank.pl, >>> e-mail: kont...@mbank.pl. District Court for the Capital City of Warsaw, >>> 12th Commercial Division of the National Court Register, KRS 0000025237, >>> NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share capital amounting to PLN >>> 169.401.468 as at 1 January 2020. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO >>> IBM-MAIN >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO >>> IBM-MAIN >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> - For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO >> IBM-MAIN >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN