I do a backup to spinning storage, then a copy of that backup to Azure for
long term.

Joe

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:12 AM Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:

> I've always gone with dual* backups, with one copy off site. Remote
> mirroring is a good option where policy permits, and even if retensioning
> is no longer relevant, rereading backups periodically will give you a heads
> up if one copy goes south. I would consider even correctable errors to be
> red flags.
>
> Any medium you use will have failure modes.
>
> Multiple PiT recovery is good for "whoops!" moments and possibly for
> audits.
>
> Large or small, each shop must do it's own risk assessments in the context
> of its own obligations and priorities.
>
> * Depending on the value of the data, you might want more than 2.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf
> of Bill Ogden [og...@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 9:27 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Storage & tape question
>
> Probably many others will chime in on this. I have lost RAID 5 arrays with
> two disk failures within an hour of each other. RAID is nice, but one must
> allow for failures.
>
> Long ago I was involved with reading archived tapes and transferring the
> data to CDs. The programs involved were home-written and the project ended
> up going nowhere. However, we discovered that tapes  kept too long started
> having errors. (At that point, for the CD copy, we just logged the error
> and accepted the corrupt data; what else could we do?) How long is "too
> long"?? It was variable, but measured in a few years. The advice then was
> to minimally read the tapes every year or so to "retension" them. Don't
> know if this would apply to more modern tape media.  (We also discovered
> that locally "burned" CDs are not expected last forever.)
>
> IMHO, the key point for tape backups are (1) off-site storage, (2)
> multiple PiT recovery, (3) logical error recovery. All this can be done
> with disk-only environments involving remote copy and lots of disk space,
> but all that becomes expensive for smaller shops.
>
> Bill Ogden
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to