Tony Harminc wrote: >What is (and will be) the licensing status of SuperWylbur? Is there >potential to turn this into a community maintained project? There are >surely at least hobbyists out there who would love to play with it.
That's a good idea. The only caveat I can think of is that sometimes there's "encumbered" code in a particular product. However, that seems unlikely in this case (see below), and even if that were the case it's still possible to release only the unencumbered code. John Giltner wrote: >It is still distributed with full source code. That's promising for these purposes. It means there's no first party distribution effort required. Permission alone to one or more second parties would be sufficient. - - - - - - - - - - Timothy Sipples I.T. Architect Executive Digital Asset & Other Industry Solutions IBM Z & LinuxONE - - - - - - - - - - E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
