On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:14:39 -0500, Lionel B Dyck wrote:
>Kirk - thank you for the ideas.
>
>What I'm doing is in the ZIGI (see https://zigi.rocks) where I need to copy
>PDS members to/from USS so that Git can manage them. With small projects this
>isn't an issue but with larger projects it could take enough time for you to
>go to lunch ☹
>
>Btw. I voted your RFE.
>
I notice that replies this thread have focused on Classic PDS as the
performance culprit. Has someone tried the benchmarks:
cp UNIX -> UNIX vs. cp PDS -> PDS
... and compared performance? I suspect Classic OS was optimized
for a few large data sets; UNIX for many small files.
Might there be an argument here for maintaining the data where it
works best and omitting the copying?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Kirk Wolf
>Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 7:03 AM
>
>FWIW: It's a pity that the IBM C library doesn't have any support for
>BLDL/NOTE/POINT processing of PDS/Es -- see my old RFE and vote if you
>agree:
>https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=80811
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
