Why do you want to get rid of the CTC connections? Do you need them for something else? Are these SCTCs or FCTCs? If yes, there are times when these may be faster than the CF. I also recommend 3 Transport Classes: 1K, 8K and 20/32K, with the last one being the default.
zNorman -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rob Schramm Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 8:19 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: XCF transport classes It is dependent on the number of messages .. and the size. Rob Schramm Rob Schramm Senior Systems Consultant Imperium Group On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Leonardo Vaz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > We are in the process of reviewing XCF definitions, like getting rid > of XCF signaling though CTCs and we are wondering if we have too many > classes defined. > > Do you think it's best to have just a couple of classes defined or to > have them more fine-grained? > > Can anyone send me their output of the following command? > D XCF,CD,CLASS=ALL > > Thanks! > Leonardo Vaz > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
