On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:16:13 +0300, Steff Gladstone wrote: >We need to capture the date and time in a GLUE and need more precision than >the CICS variables give us. > What precision do you need? Minute? Second? msec? µsec? What does CICS supply?
>Can we use the STCKCONV macro in a GLUE? Could it cause all of CICS to >enter a wait? Or is it essentially pure CPU? > It isn't documented whether STCKCONV applies the leap second correction in CVTLSO (I still need to submit an RCF.) If STCKCONV ignores CVTLSO (as I suspect) it currently returns a value about a half minute too large. Does that meet your requirement? What time zone? GMT, LOCAL, or other? Current time or converting logged values? Do you need uniqueness absent with STCKF? Has TIME macro worse overhead or better? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
