Tom's opinion: Top posting is like a meeting where one person talks, everybody hears it, and the conversation continues without having to explain the whole meeting each time. When someone new comes along though, it would be nice to have a chronological history of what happened before - that's bottom posting. And that includes archiving when the "someone new" might be reading the conversation years later.

I like top posting because most of my work is real-time conversations. If someone really wants bottom posting to catch up or for whatever reason, then it doesn't seem too hard for them to make a script or find a program to reverse the order of the conversation locally. I do that manually every once in a while when someone at work says, "Tom, can you go through this month-long email thread and try to help?" Ouch. So the first thing I do is start with a notepad window open and make notes from the bottom up, not only reversing the email string, but also trying to weed out only what I really need to better understand the issue.

Now I sometimes do a combination like Curtis just did, where I'll include portions of the original email and make comments underneath each portion. I'll usually do that by top posting with a copy/paste of just the part I'm referencing. I rarely do the "See my response in red/green/blue below" intermixed in the entire original email. When people do that to me, I often have trouble finding that one little red word somewhere in the pile.

On 6/13/2020 10:21 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
What is it with tech bulletin boards and the fuss about top-posting? I will bet I have 
gotten tens of thousands of business e-mail replies in my life and every single one of 
them was "top-posted."

What is it about tech bulletin boards where folks seem to want the most 
relevant stuff -- the new stuff -- at the BOTTOM???

I *like* Outlook.

Charles


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2020 9:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Quote style (was: ... Passive FTP ... )

On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:17:11 +0000, Jackson, Rob wrote:

My cruddy email application (Outlook) doesn't do the >-style quoting (or at 
least I don't know how to make it), so let me try below with tabs; it will 
probably be ugly.

Does First Horizon require you to use Outlook?  I mostly post from the
LISTSERV Web interface.

Does it enforce top-posting?  Does it prohibit editing quoted text, heaps
of legal disclaimers and all?

First Horizon Bank
Mainframe Technical Support

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to