On Fri, 22 May 2020 14:07:50 +0000, Robert Garrett wrote: > >I've seen that kind of problem before myself invoking various IBM utilities >repeatedly. A lot of them assume that they will always run at the jobstep >level and don't ever freemain their SP0 storage, > IBM once REJected my APAR: "Use a bigger virtual machine."
>I also wrote my own custom version of ATTCHMVS that allowed me to pass a >loadlib to be used as a TASKLIB on the ATTACH. > Was the syntax upward-compatible? And I've wished for a flavor of ATTCHMVS that would allow the subtask to run concurrently, returning the address of a completion ECB on which the programmer could WAIT. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
