David, I would, IMHO , check the region= and make sure the main task for Netview and sub tasks. A dump also provide insight into the offending module. I would also check maintenance against Netview. Eileen is correct Profile high is usually TSO rexx , been through this several times. The Rexx internal buffer space is not unlimited, you could ask for another buffer, I.e.; Makebuf equivalent.
HTH, Scott On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:02 PM Cieri, Anthony < 000002d7f4ec1fff-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > In this instance the IDCAMS command represents a NETVIEW command: > > CMDDEF.IDCAMS.MOD=DSIDCAMS > CMDDEF.IDCAMS.FOLDUP=Y > > DISPMOD DSIDCAMS > > CNM263I MODULE LENGTH CSECT DATE PTF EPA AM > ATTR > CNM263I DSIDCAMS 000570 DSIDCAMS 05/30/14 ------- 000291B0 24 RN > RU > CNM265I END OF DISPLAY > > In my example, I am running Netview V6.2.1. I believe that the > intent here was to provide a method for Netview to runs IDCAMS > "maintenance" functions on the various Netview Databases; NLDM, NPDA, TARA > etc, without the need to recycle the Netview tasks. I do use them for such > maintenance, but they run infrequently. > > I don't claim to understand the relationship/difference between > using the Netview IDCAMS command and the TSO or batch flavor, but it likely > that the storage issue is related to how Netview invokes IDCAMS. > > It might be help to route this question/issue to the Netview users > group. I believe that they are at Groups.io. > > Hth > Tony > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf > Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 12:26 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: REXX assistance > > [[ SEI WARNING *** This email was sent from an external source. Do not > open attachments or click on links from unknown or suspicious senders. *** > ]] > > > On Wed, 20 May 2020 06:45:57 -0500, Dave Jousma wrote: > > >All, > > ... > In a JCL example in > > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/zosbasics/com.ibm.zos.zdatamgmt/zsysprogc_utilities_IDCAMS.htm > I see: > //SYSPRINT DD * > > Is that probably what the writer intended? Is it even legal? > Writers should hand their examples back to coders for review and testing. > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email > to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Scott Ford IDMWORKS z/OS Development ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
