Maybe the Catalog Search Function (CSI)  might be able to help.

See it that could be something usable

Lizette



-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 9:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there any z/OS API to get byte file size for non-VSAM,
non-zFS, non-database files?

No, and I'm not even sure what the question means. If what you want is the
sum of the record lengths then you have to read through the entire file and
add up the lengths. If you want to know how big it will look to a Unix
application hen you'll need to add the number of records to account for the
LF or NL characters, unless the application is reading it as binary. The one
exception is that if it is a valid FBS dataset then you can calculate the
size.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3


________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> on behalf of
Farley, Peter x23353 <peter.far...@broadridge.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 11:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Is there any z/OS API to get byte file size for non-VSAM, non-zFS,
non-database files?

This question came to me from a co-worker: Is there any API to get the byte
file size of a non-VSAM, non-zFS, non-database file in z/OS?  I.E., byte
file size for plain sequential files?

I am aware of the "old way" of reading the VTOC of a volume to get the
various DSCB's that total up disk extents, but that gets complicated quickly
for multi-volume files, and was never guaranteed to be accurate as to the
actual byte count of data in the file except in the RECFM=FS/FBS case
anyway.

There is always the performance-killing option of just reading the whole
file and totaling up the length of every record (or block depending on how
you structure the reads), but no one would call that an API.

As far as I know there is no such API in z/OS, and this is what I told my
co-worker, but am I wrong?  Is there an alternative of which I am not aware?

TIA for your input.

Peter
--



This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail
and delete the message and any attachments from your system.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to