John Eels wrote, | How else would (or should) we let people know?
and his point is well taken. Piggybacking this information on the z/OS 2.1 (sic) preview was entirely appropriate. The text used was less so. It should have been clearer about scope, retrofitting, and the like. There would of course have been questions---How not? Finding ambiguities in IBM announcements is, oddly, some people's favorite indoor sport---no matter how impeccable this language had been, but their number would have been smaller if it had been better. John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
