On Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:08:53 -0500, John Gilmore wrote: >Is this release in fact to be denominated 2.1? > >Doing so would break with IBM's tradition of beginning the numbering >of new versions with 2.0 and the like
That's version 2, Release 1. I don't think I've ever seen any release of IBM software denoted as release 0. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
