[email protected] (Anne & Lynn Wheeler) writes: > lots of past posts pontificating about the buffer length vulnerability > issue > http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subintegrity.html#buffer
re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013.html#27 Java Security? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013.html#28 Java Security? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013.html#29 Java Security? http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013.html#31 Java Security? there is a similar thread running in usenet newsgroup comp.arch ... google group comp.arch archive: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/comp.arch/pVll8uhRKY4 including comments about java isn't totally free from buffer length vulnerabilities ... because of lots of jvm implementations being done in C-language (post by andy glew yesterday) -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
