In
<CAE1XxDGVf8mXEMYv5GiQV2-q2fqA4ogFJZLSqhqJ=iy5qo6...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 12/18/2012
at 09:41 AM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> said:
>IBM's ostrich-like failure to provide them
Is your ill-informed spin; you want a pony. It's up to IBM to decide
what types of timing comparisons are desireable and it's up to the
customers to tell IBM what types of data would be useful to them. The
fact that you don't like IBM's decisions has no bearing on whether
those decisions are reasonable.
>One standard set, or some small integer number of sets, of them
>should but probably will not be supplied by IBM.
Certainly not if IBM has already determined that they would be useless
in the real world.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
