*Hi Mike and Schmuel - *
*
*
Thank you very much for the clarification, and things are quite clear to me
now. I will try and find my way into MVS control blocks, and maybe read a
bit of the redbooks too, as you have recommended. Oh and by the ways
Schmuel, the MFT manual I was referring to is *
GC27-6939-10_MFT_Guide_R21.7_Mar72*. I procured a copy from the Internet.

I have written an article on TSO and ISPF on my blog at
http://www.mainframes360.com/2012/11/tso-and-ispf.html. Of course, the I
have articulated about time sharing at a very elementary level, to keep
things simple. I hope the data presented are accurate. In case, you find
something amiss, you can tell me.

Thank you so much,

Quasar.


On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> In
> <CA+Myz1X=YFsEu43JaGc7W5Nss2Rfhs_ovr=swfe2cww0j6e...@mail.gmail.com>,
> on 11/18/2012
>    at 01:36 PM, Quasar Chunawala <[email protected]> said:
>
> >I have done some reading from the MFT manual.
>
>  1. Which MFT manual?
>
>  2. TSO started as an OS/360 option for MVT, not for MFT.
>
> >1. Every task(like a job-step) has a TCB, correct?
>
> The job-step has more than one task, each of which has a TCB.
>
> >Is the *ASCB* the same as *TCB*?
>
> No. There is one ASCB per address space, and an address space normally
> has multiple tasks.
>
> >In the manual it states, that the READY queue is a chain of *TCB's *.
>
> In what manual? In MFT there is no ASCB, and in MVS there are multiple
> ready queues, one of which is a queue of ready address spaces.
>
> >2. You write that, the TSO user address-space remains *swapped-in*
> >atleast for the "*think-time*" period. The *think-time* is an
> >externally-controlled parameter. Once the "think-time" elapses,
> >the address-space is *logically swapped-out*? Does this apply
> >today as well?
>
> The details have changed, but the basic concept is the same.
>
> --
>      Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
>      Atid/2        <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
> (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to