John Gilmore wrote >I should have thought that Peter Relson's post had clarified these >issues more than adequately.
Ah. As enjoyable as always to hear your opinion, Mr. Gilmore, although I couldn't myself find very much in Peter Relson's posting that seemed especially helpful (not that I was looking for help myself). Nor in yours, for that matter. But be that is it may, I can't see any rational reason for dismissing additional information when it is available. I was going to add a bit more here, and some suppositions, but Jim Mulder has said most of it, and confirmed my suspicions, which is nice. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
