None of those caveats pertains to us. I believe I will go GOFF. Thanks! Frank
>________________________________ > From: Edward Jaffe <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 4:22 PM >Subject: Re: GOFF > >On 8/20/2012 3:11 PM, Frank Swarbrick wrote: >> I am converting to assembler subroutines, which are called by (Enterprise) >> COBOL programs to do various things, to make them re-entrant. Is there any >> reason I should not change my assembler options to specify GOFF? > >GOFF is only a problem if you need to link on a severely back-level binder or >linkage editor or on a non-z/OS system. Otherwise, it's great! > >-- Edward E Jaffe >Phoenix Software International, Inc >831 Parkview Drive North >El Segundo, CA 90245 >310-338-0400 x318 >[email protected] >http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
