Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:

>> I seem to recall that in a previous thread, that standard was mentioned, but 
>> could not find it.
>The first place I'd look is <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html>.

Ah, yes, many thanks! And there is also a very handy link to IETF too. They are 
now having a meeting, IETF 84, in Vancouver.

Interesting quote from these sites: "Finding RFCs for a particular topic is an 
art." ... :-)

Time for me to do some catch-up. Shmuel, many thanks for providing this link.

Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht


I would like to share with you this gem (from the link provided by Chris Mason 
earlier in this thread):


"This example is occasionally used in mailing lists to mock and discourage 
top-posting:

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?"

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to