Just to irritate a few people here <grin>. Too bad SMP/E does not support a 
UNIX subdirectory as an SMPPTS repository.

--
John McKown 
Systems Engineer IV
IT

Administrative Services Group

HealthMarkets(r)

9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * 
[email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the 
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance 
Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The 
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 12:10 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: PDSE and DFDSS
> 
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:15:06 +0200, R.S. wrote:
> >
> >BTW: I really don't like SMPPTS. This is cumbersome, especially with
> >pseudo-conctatenations (SMPPTS, SMPPTS1, ...oops! I  forgot to define
> >one of them in some zone...).
> > 
> Sigh.  The family of problems:
> 
> o Limited number of tracks in a PDS
> 
> o Limited number of records in a PDSE member
> 
> o Neither PDS nor PDSE can span volumes.
> 
> "The biggest and most common mistake that can be made in computer
> design is that of not providing enough address bits for memory
> addressing and management," -- Gordon Bell
> 
> -- gil
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to