Read it again. He did say both "shortcut" and "shorthand"
Bill Fairchild Programmer Rocket Software 408 Chamberlain Park Lane * Franklin, TN 37069-2526 * USA t: +1.617.614.4503 * e: [email protected] * w: www.rocketsoftware.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of zMan Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 6:31 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: 24/7/365 appropriateness was Re: IBMLink outages in 2012 On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) < [email protected]> wrote: > In <[email protected]>, on 05/23/2012 > at 08:54 AM, Clark Morris <[email protected]> said: > > >On a logical basis I agree with you but has the 24/7/365 shortcut for > >continuous availability become so pervasive that it is the shorthand > >way for saying it > > Shorthand? How is 24/7/365 shorter than 24/7? It's not. But it's shorter (or at least easier to remember/type/understand for most people) than 86400/365 or 31536000. And he didn't say "shorthand", he said "shortcut". Are we done now? -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
