On Tue, 22 May 2012 12:49:48 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote: >Pointing to the specific manual and section title would have been good >since the specifics could change. I did a quick check that manual prior to >Kirk posting, as that is where I expected to find it but somehow missed >it within all the XPLINK hits I had. I see now that 3 of the modules >in the sample LPA member (2 + 1 alias) are documented as XPLINK >in appendix 1.3.2. CRTEC128 and alias C128 are not mentioned >at all in that section.
I think that some confusion was caused by the recommendation to include XPLink modules in LPA. The section of the manual that points to the member references C/C++. XPLink is actually, a calling convention that is used by C/C++. The recommendation should probably have been to include C/C++ runtime modules in dynamic LPA. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
