R Skorupka wrote: >SCRT does require all systems to have uniques SYSID. This requirement is >described in SCRT manual.
Oh yes, I now rereaded that part. Thanks for the reminder. >SCRT is REALLY BAD product, I know several cases where it gives false results >even if you fulfill all the requirement. Really bad? To add to your pain, look up the new paragraph 'Machine replacements and machine software model upgrades' and come back... >SCRT does not like: changing SYSIDs, SMF records out of the scope (i.e. from >previous month) - I mean "valid" records PLUS older ones. I hate it to add *NONE to each software product you're not using... but that is only me and my lazy typing... [1] :-/ >BTW: the requirement of uniques SYSIDs is simply STUPID. There is identifier >which is really unique: LPAR name. From the other hand there are cases when >you could need imple PiT copy, a CLONE of you z/OS system. You can clone >everything except the SYSID. Reason: SCRT. There must be a reason beside SCRT, but I'm too low in the food chain to challenge/question it... :-) Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht [1] - You just can't go on a C ALL '= ' '=*NONE' spree without breaking something ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
