Bill,
 
In my first e-mail, I displayed the dsn the following way:
 
ISPF 3.4 
ZWA6PWG.ICO9999D.DMSC.D2012087.T130018 
Next, I typed I besided the dsn
Then it displayed me the dsn stats.


________________________________
From: Bill Fairchild <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:48:44 PM
Subject: Re: DSN MYSTERY - CURRENT UTILIZATION GREATER THAN CURRENT ALLOCATION.

The display you show below only displays the first 3 extents, which have a 
total of 3*1074=3222 tracks, which is what your previous email said was the 
total of all tracks allocated.  This display also shows a non-zero pointer to a 
F3 DSCB in which will be described up to 13 more extents of which your data set 
will have non-zero values in the first 9, for a grand total of 12*1074=12888 
tracks.  The last block pointer in the display below agrees with the number of 
tracks utilized in your previous email.  It appears that for some reason the 
program that you used to display the data set attributes in your previous email 
ignored the F3 DSCB.  Or perhaps you asked the system to tell you the data set 
attributes in your previous email at just the wrong millisecond when the system 
was also in the midst of updating the F1 DSCB.  Possibly your display request 
read the F1, began formatting the display, then read the F1 again after 
formatting the number of
 tracks allocated but in between!
  your two reads of the F1 the system rewrote the F1 and changed the last block 
pointer field, then when your display request read the F1 again it displayed 
the non-zero last block pointer.  Some code is perhaps not properly serializing 
on the VTOC accesses.  Either way, you should get IBM involved in resolving 
this issue, assuming that IBM wrote the program that you used for your previous 
display.

Bill Fairchild
Programmer
Rocket Software
408 Chamberlain Park Lane . Franklin, TN 37069-2526 . USA
t: +1.617.614.4503 .  e: [email protected] . w: 
www.rocketsoftware.com

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
esmie moo
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 12:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: DSN MYSTERY - CURRENT UTILIZATION GREATER THAN CURRENT ALLOCATION.

Hi Tom,
 
I ran the IEHLIST with FORMAT option and this is what it tells me:
 
SMS.NPE   LRECL  KEYLEN  INITIAL ALLOC  2ND ALLOC    EXTEND     LAST 
BLK(T-R-L)  DIR.REM  F2 OR F3(C-H-R)  
DSCB(C-H-                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 R)
                               0                        TRKS                        1074                                     12595  
 2     2176                     0           1  20      0   1  18
 EATTR
 NS
0            EXTENTS  NO  LOW(C-H)   HIGH(C-H)    NO  LOW(C-H)   HIGH(C-H)    
NO LOW(C-H)   HIGH(C-H)
                                    0      1137      9       1209  2          
1      1209      3     1280      11      2  1280     12         1352  5
                                    0             0      0            0  0      
    0            0      0            0      0        0        0      
0               0  0
                                    0             0      0            0  0      
    0            0      0            0      0        0        0      
0               0  0
                                    0             0      0            0  0      
    0            0      0            0      0        0        0      
0               0  0
                                 ----ON THE ABOVE DATA SET,THERE ARE       9374 
EMPTY TRACK(S)
0                               
 
I am not sure if this confirms the information of ISFP  .  Could you take a 
look please?                                             


________________________________
From: Tom Marchant <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 12:51:11 PM
Subject: Re: DSN MYSTERY - CURRENT UTILIZATION GREATER THAN CURRENT ALLOCATION.

On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:24:10 -0700, esmie moo wrote:

>Good Morning Gentle Readers,
 
>The dsn has the following allcation but I am not sure how to correct 
>the problem.   I have never seen before where the current utilization 
>is larger than the allocation.
 
I've never seen that either.  Before attempting any correction, I  would use 
IEHLIST to obtain a LISTVTOC FORMAT and a LISTVTOC DUMP for the data set.  I 
wonder if ISPF is reporting the information correctly.  If the LISTVTOC 
confirms the information that ISPF shows, I'd recommend calling the IBM support 
center.

--
Tom Marchant

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to