On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:29:13 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote: >> >> Cheers, >> TomR>> COBOL is the Language of the Future!<< > >So, in other words, you'll make the exclusion explicit instead of >removing the restriction. :-) > >But, I gather from some of the discussions, and your comments, on >this list, you are rather tied up with other compiler priorities >these days. > >Hope all is well. > Errr... Does that compiler not already contain code to read input from legacy data sets in the case when it's invoked in batch, or is it a completely different compiler?
What happens in the batch case if the copybook concatenation contains a USS directory? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
