On 04/11/2012 11:12 AM, McKown, John wrote:
Not legally. But I've heard rumors that it does.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
[email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance
Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 8:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Query about overcoming -- debunking, countering,
and burying --mainframe myths
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:04:45 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
A renowned industry expert ...
[said] the 4341 might not be compatible with the 148
Not what you are looking for, but in the late 1970's, when I
was an Amdahl SE someone said that they understood that
the Amdahl was IBM-compatible, but would it run Cobol?
I understand that Hercules is zSeries compatible, but will
it run z/OS?
-- gil
...
I realize it would be ridiculous from a performance and cost standpoint
to do so, but as a test of Hercules functionality I have always wondered
if it would be possible to run z/OS legally under Hercules if you did it
under a Linux system running in an LPAR on GP processors on a z box
already licensed for running z/OS natively?
--
Joel C. Ewing, Bentonville, AR [email protected]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
