That's a piece of string you have there and it looks like some of it is snaking round the corner and out of view. :-)
Seriously, it would depend on things like how much processing to eliminate the ones you don't want, how many records you're suppressing and so on. Probably better to eliminate the production of the IFCIDs at source. Which ones are we talking about? Cheers, Martin Martin Packer, Mainframe Performance Consultant, zChampion Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email: [email protected] Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker From: Donald Likens <[email protected]> To: [email protected], Date: 11/04/2012 11:37 Subject: SMF from critical application Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> We are thinking about writing a SMF exit (IEFU8x) to not write certain DB2 IFCIDS of the SMF 102 record. Can anyone direct me to some documentation that would help me to understand how much processing time would be saved by doing this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
